Værmodifisering og Geoengineering

[Jay Wilson]

Jay Wilson

Researchers have documented strange, highly organized structures in both blood and urine—tiny vesicles, fibers, crystals, and colloids that don’t behave like natural biology. First observed in vaccines and anesthetics, these same shapes appear in the bodies of humans and even animals, sometimes mimicking red blood cells yet lacking their natural features. Microscopy shows they self-assemble, transition from gels into fibers and sheets, and even maintain their form when excreted. Adding to the mystery, unusual wireless-like emissions have been detected near exposed individuals, hinting at a hidden bio-digital interface. These findings are visible, reproducible, and demand urgent scientific scrutiny.
Below is an overview of the paper Self-Assembling Nanostructures in Blood and Urine: Implications for Bioaccumulation and Detoxification (David Nixon, Journal of BioNanoTechnocracy, 2025),
https://www.mpowertranslations.info/... ... sembling...
-Overview written by Jay Wilson
---
Abstract
The paper reports finding unusual microscopic structures in blood and urine—tiny crystals, vesicles (bubble-like shapes), and colloids. These shapes don’t look random; they appear engineered and may even react to electromagnetic fields. The author suggests they might be connected to pharmaceutical products like vaccines or anesthetics, since similar structures were seen in those substances. Some evidence points to a hidden communication system at a biological–digital interface, raising questions about intent and safety.
---
General Summary
Since 2021, researchers have seen strange microscopic patterns in vaccines and anesthetics—crystals, fibers, and vesicle-like bubbles that don’t resemble natural biology. These same shapes later showed up in blood and urine samples from exposed people, and also in some animals. They’re highly organized and don’t appear to be random contamination. On top of that, unusual wireless signals have been picked up near vaccinated people that don’t match normal Bluetooth devices, hinting at a hidden broadcast system. These findings call for urgent, independent investigation.
---
Introduction
The author explains the background:
Independent studies since 2021 have shown blood anomalies (crystals, fibers, particulates) only in vaccinated individuals, not unvaccinated.
These patterns have been ignored by regulators despite being peer-reviewed.
Some researchers propose these aren’t accidents but part of a broader technological deployment—a hidden “bio-nano” network inside bodies.
The author’s own microscopy work found that pharmaceutical products (like COVID vaccines and anesthetics) can produce the same structures, which later appear in blood and urine.
These structures may even emit wireless-like signals, suggesting a communication function.
---
Materials and Methods
Microscopy was done with bright-field and dark-field microscopes.
Blood was collected by finger prick, placed directly on slides without preservatives, and examined immediately.
No special control samples were used in this study, but the author refers to earlier work where controls were done to rule out contamination.
---
Results
The results are heavily illustrated with microscopy images:
Vesicles (bubbles): Seen in both human and animal blood. Some look like red blood cells but lack their normal features, suggesting synthetic analogues. They often act as “hubs” where fibers or crystals start forming.
Fibers: Fibers sometimes grow out of vesicles and can later merge into sheets, showing an organized self-assembly process.
Crystals and colloids: Crystalline platelets, arched structures, and granular colloids were documented. Some showed features suggesting electromagnetic influence.
Urine samples: Similar structures were excreted—vesicles, crystalline sheets, and complex flower-like patterns. This suggests the body may try to flush them out, but the structures remain intact.
Overall, the study shows consistent patterns of non-biological looking structures in both blood and urine.
---
Discussion
The paper interprets these results:
The consistent presence of vesicles, crystals, and colloids suggests programmed self-assembly, not random debris.
The transition from gels → fibers → sheets looks like stepwise construction.
Some structures resemble engineered nanosystems, with internal compartments and optical properties.
Wireless anomalies (unusual Bluetooth signals) reported near vaccinated people may be related, hinting at a bio-digital interface.
Similar anomalies have been seen in animals and veterinary products, suggesting cross-species exposure.
The author stresses that the lack of regulatory follow-up is concerning, and argues for urgent investigation.
---
Conclusion
The study found reproducible, complex structures in blood and urine, resembling those in pharmaceutical products. Their shapes, persistence, and possible electromagnetic sensitivity suggest they may be synthetic biomaterials rather than natural formations. Because similar findings appear across species, the issue may be systemic. The author calls for independent, multidisciplinary studies to confirm or disprove these findings.
---
References
The paper cites:
Research documenting blood anomalies in vaccinated people.
Theoretical work on “bio-nano panopticons.”
Work on synthetic biology and nanonetworks.
Classic studies on the “Internet of Bio-Nano Things” (IoBNT).
---
Glossary & Legal Disclaimer
The glossary explains technical terms like vesicles, colloids, entropy, and “synthetic nanonetwork layer.” The disclaimer stresses that the paper is informational and not a medical guideline.
---
In plain terms
This paper argues that strange microscopic structures are consistently appearing in blood and urine after exposure to certain pharmaceutical products. They look engineered, not natural, and may even connect to hidden communication signals. The author believes this deserves urgent scientific and regulatory attention.

[Anita Bekkelund]

Geoengineering-Norway.org
Anita Bekkelund

Administrator

Aktiv bidragsyter
Jeg kjenner jeg blir litt oppgitt over uttalelser som : "jeg regner med at de har en hensikt med det som gjøres, så da finner jeg med i det". Det er litt slapt rett og slett. For eksempel ettervirkningene av "Agent Orange" i Vietnam i 1968 har enda ikke gått over. Altså senskader. Vi har enda ikke opplevd alle senskadene som følge av alle Covid vaksinene.
For ikke så lenge siden, diskuterte jeg emnet Geoengineering med en person. Hvorpå personen ser ned på meg på en måte i sine uttalelser. "Neimen kjære deg da ( som om jeg var et småbarn som hadde skadet meg) TROR du på slikt du da"?
"Send meg artikler som omhandler chemtrails, så skal jeg vurdere om de er sanne". Joda, jeg sendte masse dokumentasjon til vedkommende jeg. Som videre hadde brukt KI for å vurdere tekstene. KI er tross alt skapt av mennesker. Det er ikke noe vanvittig fantastisk og flott som har absolutt alle svar, ei heller fornuftige.
Jeg sa GLEM navnet chemtrails. Det er geoengineering og skysåing man må søke på.
Svaret til personen var: ÅÅååå, jamen geoengineering eksisterer jo. Så hva er problemet ?? Trodde jeg skulle undersøke angående chemtrails jeg.
"Hva er problemet"? Skjønner du eller ? Så det ar altså HELT i orden at naturen blir utsatt for sølviodid, selv om det er små mengder ( jada, det gjør INGENTING når det kun er små mengder ) og det står svart på hvitt i sikkerhetsblad "unngå utslipp til miljøet".
"Vi får håpe det er lite da, for de vet sikkert hva de gjør".
Greit å vite, tenker ihvertfall jeg da...HVA det er man utsettes for
https://sol.no/.../40-ar-etter-vietnamk ... ./69957268
https://www.carlroth.com/medias/SDB-6630-NO-NO.pdf...
AI-oversikt
Geoengineering concepts have been explored since at least the late 1940s, evolving from early "weather modification" to counter regional events like droughts to current strategies aimed at addressing global climate change. Post-WWII, research in the US and USSR focused on cloud seeding, while Project Stormfury (1962-1983) attempted to weaken hurricanes. The Soviet scientist Mikhail Budyko proposed stratospheric aerosols in the 1970s to offset global warming. Later, in the early 2000s, the concept re-emerged and expanded to include both Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and Solar Radiation Management (SRM), like stratospheric aerosol injection, in response to growing concerns about climate change.
Early Geoengineering & Weather Modification (1940s-1960s)
Cloud Seeding:
Building on work by Vincent Schaefer and Irvin Langmuir in the late 1940s, the U.S. and USSR explored cloud seeding to increase rainfall for crops and potentially gain military advantage.
Military Applications:
Operation Popeye (1967-1972) used cloud seeding to try to prolong the monsoon season over Southeast Asia.
Project Stormfury (1962-1983):
U.S. government researchers experimented with cloud seeding to reduce the intensity of tropical hurricanes.
Emergence of Climate-Focused Geoengineering (1970s-1980s)

Mikhail Budyko's Proposal: In 1977, Soviet scientist Mikhail Budyko proposed injecting sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth, offsetting warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions.
Modern Geoengineering (Post-2000s)

Renewed Interest:
The concept of geoengineering experienced a resurgence in scientific and public discourse in the early 21st century, largely in response to the worsening climate crisis.
Categorization into CDR and SRM:
Modern geoengineering is generally divided into two main approaches:
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Aims to remove CO2 from the atmosphere through methods like afforestation, enhanced weathering, or ocean fertilization to stimulate plankton growth.
Solar Radiation Management (SRM): Seeks to reflect a small percentage of sunlight back into space to cool the planet. Techniques include:

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection: Mimics volcanic eruptions by placing reflective particles in the stratosphere.
Marine Cloud Brightening: Involves spraying salt particles into low-lying clouds over oceans to make them more reflective.
Surface Albedo Modification: Increasing the reflectivity of surfaces, such as painting roofs white or using reflective materials in urban and desert areas.
CARLROTH.COM
http://www.carlroth.com

[BmOnline]

Når må dere være oppmerksom på at snøen som som legger seg er full av gift.
Ikke la dine barn leke ute.

Mvh
BmOnline forum.

[Snøen]

Nå er det viktig å få med seg hva som skjuler seg i snøen i dag?

Husk, ikke la dine søte små å spise snøen som daler ned i dag. Den er meget giftig.

Mvh
Forum Admin
BmOnline.

[Snøen]

Nå er det viktig å få med seg hva som skjuler seg i snøen i dag?

Husk, ikke la dine søte små å spise snøen som daler ned i dag. Den er meget giftig.

Mvh
Forum Admin
BmOnline.